
 
 


 












|
|
Court Holds Final Hearing to Approve
Settlement
The
parties are presently awaiting a
Court Order with regards to the
settlement, which is anticipated on
or after May 15, 2012. On
February 15, 2012, the Honorable
Harwell G. Davis III held a hearing
in the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
in Birmingham in which Class Counsel
sought final approval of the
settlement of this class action. Any settlement payments to
claimants can only be made after an
Order approving the settlement
becomes final. In the meantime,
questions with regard to claims,
acknowledgment forms, and dispute
forms can be directed to the claims
administrator, Garden City Group, at
(888) 714-2544. This website also
will be periodically updated. |
|
Note to Claimants Receiving
Acknowledgment of Receipt of Valid Claim
Forms
The claims
administrator, Garden City Group, has
begun to send out acknowledgment of
receipt of valid claim forms to
claimants. Some of these forms state a
"My Tuition Amount" of $0. The
administrator presently is utilizing the
data made available to it from Clayton
College, which clearly is not complete.
Claimants who receive an acknowledgment
form with a "My Tuition Amount" of $0 or
another number that appears to be in
error should complete and submit a
dispute form providing additional
information and documents demonstrating
what they believe their correct "My
Tuition Amount" to be. A dispute form is
available
here. Because the
deadline for submission of dispute forms
is February 15, 2012, dispute forms
should promptly be submitted. |
|
In November
2010, a class action lawsuit was filed
in the United States District Court for
the Northern District of Alabama in
Birmingham, seeking recoveries on behalf
of thousands of adults enrolled in
prepaid distance education programs at
Clayton College of Natural Health, Inc.
The lawsuit comes in the wake of CCNH’s
announcement in July 2010 that it was
suddenly closing the school and its
distance education programs after more
than 20 years
of operation. |
 |
|
The lawsuit alleges that
at the time of the closing, CCNH had already collected
tens of millions of dollars in tuition from Plaintiffs
and a class of similarly situated persons for programs
that CCNH summarily stopped providing. After the abrupt
termination of its distance education
programs, CCNH failed to refund tuition, according to
the lawsuit On November 15, 2011, the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
certified this case as a class action and granted
preliminary approval of a settlement in the case. The
settlement, reached through negotiations with a
mediator, will create a settlement fund from which
claimants can seek compensation, among other benefits. A
formal Class Notice from the Court regarding the
settlement has been mailed. For a copy of the
Class Notice, click
here,
for a copy of the Claim Form, click
here. |
| |
|
Class Counsel for the
former students are Thomas H.
Howlett and Dean M. Googasian of The Googasian Firm,
P.C., who may be contacted by calling 1-877-540-8333, or
by clicking here or sending an e-mail to
ccnhlawsuit@googasian.com.
Joining The Googasian Firm in pursuit of the lawsuit as
local counsel is the Birmingham, Alabama-based law
firm, Quinn, Connor, Weaver, Davies & Rouco, LLC.
According to the lawsuit, CCNH marketed its programs as affording students the ability to learn and
pursue degree and certificate programs with flexibility
as to the time within which they were completed. In its
2008 catalog, CCNH stated that, “At CCNH, the self-paced
programs are designed to fit your schedule, so that any
part of the day becomes study time and assignments may
be submitted at your convenience. In order to help you
organize your studies and ‘stay on track,’ degree
programs are divided into phases. Although you must
complete the phases of your program sequentially, there
is no requirement that you take every course in the
order it appears in the phase. It is our expectation
that you will complete all phases of each individual
degree program within five years. At CCNH, you enroll,
study, and progress on your schedule, not ours.” But the
sudden closure of CCNH precludes these students from
completing the distance education programs
for which they had paid and devoted considerable time
and effort, the lawsuit alleges.
If you have a concern about experiences with CCNH or
Magnolia, click here to share
these concerns.
The lawsuit asserts breach of fiduciary duty,
negligence, and other claims, and seeks compensation for
the tuition amounts paid for programs that are no longer
available and for Plaintiffs’ loss of time and
opportunity, among other damages. A copy of the lawsuit
can be found by clicking
here.
In accordance with
Alabama State Bar requirements, no representation is
made that the quality of legal services to be performed
is greater than the quality of legal services performed
by other lawyers. ARPC 7.2 (e).
|
|